
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Cross-X: The Amazing True Story of How the Most Unlikely Team from the Most Unlikely of Places Overcame Staggering Obstacles at Home and at School to ... Community on Race, Power, and Education Hardcover – October 3, 2006
In Cross-X, journalist Joe Miller follows the Kansas City Central High School’s debate squad through the 2002 season that ends with a top-ten finish at the national championships in Atlanta.
By almost all measures, Central is just another failing inner-city school. Ninety-nine percent of the students are minorities. Only one in three graduate. Test scores are so low that Missouri bureaucrats have declared the school “academically deficient.” But week after week, a crew of Central kids heads off to debate tournaments in suburbs across the Midwest and South, where they routinely beat teams from top-ranked schools. In a game of fast-talking, wit, and sheer brilliance, these students close the achievement gap between black and white students—an accomplishment that educators and policy makers across the country have been striving toward for years.
Here is the riveting and poignant story of four debaters and their coach as they battle formidable opponents from elite prep schools, bureaucrats who seem maddeningly determined to hold them back, friends and family who are mired in poverty and drug addiction, and—perhaps most daunting—their own self-destructive choices. In the end, Miller finds himself on a campaign to change debate itself, certain that these students from the Eastside of Kansas City may be the saviors of a game that is intrinsic to American democracy.
- Print length496 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFarrar, Straus and Giroux
- Publication dateOctober 3, 2006
- Dimensions6.25 x 1.5 x 9.25 inches
- ISBN-100374131945
- ISBN-13978-0374131944
- Lexile measure1060L
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From School Library Journal
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Bookmarks Magazine
Copyright © 2004 Phillips & Nelson Media, Inc.
From Booklist
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Review
"Cross-X is one of the most original and compelling narratives about race, class and education that I have ever read. Herein, Joe Miller proves himself both a first-rate storyteller, and a keen observer of the way in which urban communities (and the people who live there) have been decimated by racism and economic apartheid. The young men and women at the heart of this volume, who show their resolve in struggling against a culture of intellectual elitism within the world of competitive debate, and the society at large, are heroes in every sense of the word; and Miller, by telling their story, has done a great service to us all."
—Tim Wise, author of White Like Me: Reflections on Race from a Privileged Son and Affirmative Action: Racial Preference in Black and White
About the Author
Joe Miller is a journalist living in Kansas City. His writing has appeared in The Pitch, Poets & Writers, Art in America, Art Papers, New Art Examiner, RockyMountain News, and BoulderCountyBusiness Report. He is the 2003 recipient of the President’s Award Recognizing Outstanding Contributions in Journalism, Kansas City Press Club. Cross-X is his first book.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Chapter One
First Day
Jane Rinehart began the best and worst year of her teaching career in a familiar pose: hands on hips, lips pinched in a downward twist, one eyebrow cocked above the other. Seven kids slumped at their desks and scowled back at her. She only knew one of them—Ebony Rose, a gangly sixteen-year-old with a ghetto accent so thick people often had to ask him to repeat himself three or four times before they could understand what he’d said. The rest were strangers who wound up in her beginning debate class because the new hires in the school’s counseling office were, like so many administrators in Kansas City, Missouri’s notoriously dysfunctional school district, inept or lazy or both.
The previous spring she and her team of debaters canvassed Central High School in search of new recruits. They looked everywhere—in the cavernous lunchroom, the noisy study halls, the history classes full of bored teens scratching answers onto photocopied worksheets. They even checked the windowless room where cutups sit for hours on end to atone for their sins. (“In an inner-city school, in-school suspension is one of the best places to find good debaters,” Rinehart often said.) They tracked down tips from fellow students and teachers who had learned years ago to steer smart kids to Rinehart’s program, one of the few bright spots in a school where more than half the incoming freshmen drop out before their senior year. Within a few weeks, she hand-delivered a list of eighteen prospective debaters to the counseling office well before the cutoff date.
But they lost it. So she turned in another. She even offered to type the names into the school’s computer system herself. “No, no,” one of the counselors told her. “We can handle it.”
They couldn’t. When Rinehart opened up her schedule packet a few days before the start of school, she found that not one of her recruits had been enrolled in beginning debate. When she brought this to the attention of her assistant principal, the administrator shrugged. “They’re new,” her boss said of the school’s counselors. “What do you expect?”
As Rinehart sized up her meager prospects, a girl with long, skinny braids threw open the door and marched two steps into the room. Rinehart turned and stared her down.
“This ain’t no required class, is it?” the girl asked.
“This isn’t any?” Rinehart replied without hesitation.
The girl’s shoulders dropped. “Do we gotta take this class?!”
“You don’t gotta take anything.”
“I mean . . .” the girl sputtered.
“This isn’t a mandated class, if that’s what you want to know.”
“That’s what I wanted to know.”
“But if you only go through life doing the minimum,” Rinehart said as the girl plopped herself into one of the twenty empty desks, “the minimum is all you’ll get out of life.”
Rinehart crossed her arms and glanced around her classroom, which, only two hours into the school year, looked as if a gale had blown through and tossed around all the desks and books and files. Room 109, the one-window headquarters for Central’s debate program, contains too much bustle to be as orderly as a typical high school room. Even before the school year started, with summer’s free days dwindling, kids flitted in and out of Rinehart’s domain to seek advice on the cases they were building for the coming season or simply to escape the bleak streets of Kansas City’s East Side.
Rinehart moved to the dry-erase board, uncapped a purple marker, and wrote, “Resolved: That the federal government should substantially increase public mental health services for mental health care in the United States.” She turned to face the students, who were stretched so far back in their chairs they were nearly horizontal. Each kid grudgingly wore a baggy version of the school’s mandatory uniforms: khaki or navy blue pants with navy blue or white shirts.
“I’m Mrs. Rinehart,” she said cheerily, trying to shake off her bad mood. “This is the debate class. You are the beginners. You are the novices. You are the hope for the future. You are the ones who are going to win trophies like this.” She gestured toward a handsome copper chalice rising from an old audiovisual cart stuffed with books and papers and plastic cups full of pencils and pens. “We run with the big dogs.”
A few of the kids chuckled at this short white woman who stood before them in her prim silk blouse and matching marigold skirt, trying to talk trash.
“We do,” she insisted, hands back on her hips.
She rattled off an abbreviated list of accomplishments: the trophy case near the principal’s office stuffed with shiny metal; the victories at out-of-state tournaments; the scholarships. “Last year one of my top debaters, Donnell, got a full scholarship to the University of Northern Iowa because of his debate skills,” she said. “All he has to do is argue in college and they pay for him to go.”
“I want some of that,” said a girl with bright red hair sprouting from the top of her crown.
“Yeah,” Rinehart said. “All he has to do is argue with attitude.”
She paused to let that sink in. Even for cocky kids, it was difficult to fathom such success at a school like Central. Over the past half century, the school had become a nationally recognized symbol for the despair of urban education. It was the flash point of Kansas City’s riots in the late 1960s. In the early 1970s the school’s security guards carried handguns as they roamed the halls. Through the 1980s and ’90s, ABC, 60 Minutes, scores of newspapers, and even Jesse Jackson paid visits to Central—all to tell virtually the same stories of failure or slim hope. And then, in 2001, as if for final emphasis, Missouri education officials put the school on alert, declaring it “academically deficient.”
The students stared at Rinehart blankly. “At this point,” she continued, “if you don’t know anything about debate, don’t worry about it. That’s my problem. If you don’t know anything about it in six months, then maybe it’ll be your problem. But for now it’s my problem.”
She told the students to form a circle, and they sluggishly scooted their desks across the tile floor. “Debate is basically arguing,” she said, sitting down, crossing her legs off to the side, and leaning forward on the desk. “And this is what we’re going to be arguing this year.” She cocked her head toward the board and again read aloud the resolution to improve mental health services in the United States, the topic selected by coaches from across the country for the year ahead.
“What does that mean?” she asked, facing the kids again. “What is mental health?”
The teens blinked back at her.
Finally one boy offered, “Health is healthy.”
“Your brain,” added another.
“People who have mental health problems, what do we call them?” Rinehart asked.
After another long pause, one student looked up and said, in a bored voice, “Mentally ill.”
“Don’t we have some not-so-nice words for them?” Rinehart asked.
Silence. Then a skinny boy with cornrows muttered, “Retarded.”
“Okay,” she said. “Retarded. What else?”
Product details
- Publisher : Farrar, Straus and Giroux
- Publication date : October 3, 2006
- Language : English
- Print length : 496 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0374131945
- ISBN-13 : 978-0374131944
- Item Weight : 1.8 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.25 x 1.5 x 9.25 inches
- Lexile measure : 1060L
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,739,018 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #47,824 in Sociology (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star5 star63%24%13%0%0%63%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star4 star63%24%13%0%0%24%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star63%24%13%0%0%13%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star63%24%13%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star63%24%13%0%0%0%
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2009Format: PaperbackVerified PurchaseJoe Miller does a remarkable job of not only illustrating the trials of a remarkable high school debate team and their persistent coach, but also provides a glimpse into the greater challenges affecting high school policy debate. Interventionist, unqualified "soccer mom" judges, uneven ground between elite academy schools and under-funded inner city programs, and the failure of organizations charged with educational advocacy all come into play.
As a relatively new coach and varsity policy judge in the same upper-Midwest circuit (who has judged Jane's teams as well as Linda Collier's from Barstow), I can attest to the challenges Joe picks up on. Joe gets inside the very issue of judging bias prevelant in many rounds and effectively communicates its impact on the educational experience of debate. So many well-intentioned participants in our world end up causing greater harm.
Policy debate is a unique and vitally important program -- a place where William Barrett (of "Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy") would most likely recognize that philosophy had moved out of the Academy and was alive and well in the minds of young debaters. But through the rejection of creative exploration of debate through critical theory, the misunderstanding of speed and spread (which Joe correctly explains is a method to provide much greater depth, coverage and exploration of rather deep issues in the limits of a single hour debate round) and the inclusion of laymen judges left to render horribly interventionist decisions that often drag in extensive socioeconomic (and indirectly, racist) bias all harms the value of this important intellectual activity.
As an insight into the policy debate world, Joe's book is remarkable, fresh and personal. Coaches, parents of policy debaters and debaters themselves are well served to read Cross-X.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 9, 2009Format: PaperbackJoe Miller's Cross-X profiles four high school debaters and their motherly coach. It goes into details about their home lives (a drug addicted mother), their school lives (sub-par school), their would-be sex lives (non-existent, but all-so important), their encounters with racism (subtle, but influential) and the world of policy debate (too fast to understand). A palpable picture is painted that shows how all of these seemingly disparate elements of a student's life come together to influence these teenagers. Cross-X zeros in on how debate reflects the successes and hardships of inner-city youth. Will they practice hard? How will they act after victory and defeat? How does their race and culture influence the relationship with their peers and coach?
Cross-X relays the shameful and racist history that has made their school, Central High in Kansas City, an under-performer. Again, it is the multiple dimensions of the students' lives that gives depth of understanding to the issues that make Central High a bastion of underachievement. The debate team provides a friendly and intellectually stimulating haven for a select few of Central's students. Unlike initiatives like the Harlem Children's Zone, which seek to make make strong the most marginalized and underserved, Central's debate coach seems to handpick the best and the brightest. The debate coach needs witty and sharp minds and isn't afraid to search for recruits in unlikely places like the in-school suspension room. Still, you get the feeling that these students are some of the most privileged at Central High School. Nonetheless, these students don't have the same kind of in- or out-of-school support compared to the students on the state and national debate circuit that they occasionally bring to tears during an emotional debate round. This is a story of witty students who rise, when given the opportunity. Playing football, playing in a music group, or running with a drug-dealing gang are not the kinds of activities these particular students want or need: they desire fast-paced intellectual competition. But, the debaters are not just nerds: they cuss, drink alcohol, and are conversant in the latest pop-culture trends.
Having myself been a policy debater for one year in high school, I enjoyed Miller's descriptions of the twirling pen culture and overly fast reading during debates. A sizable portion of the book is devoted to a deconstruction of debate and whether its rules and culture should be changed. The fierce competition described makes me wonder if debate might form unnecessarily adversarial personality traits. In addition, the lightening fast reading of cases, that the debaters themselves don't always understand, makes the debate culture appear insincere. However, I do not feel this makes it a worse activity than playing basketball or running for student council. Policy debate can be used to defend or reject long-standing beliefs about anything. It is what is debated and how the debate unfolds that makes for a worthy learning experience. Miller gives us a look at debate in the context of four black students' lives, which makes Cross-X a valuable resource that peers, with detail, into a marginalized culture that is too seldom given nuanced description.
Miller is an author/researcher/journalist who inevitably gets involved with his subjects. His candid acknowledgments of his biases and influences make this book stronger than if he had not relayed those elements. For instance, he becomes mad when he witnesses racism, he gives friendly advice and he also fights for what he feels will help these kids. For better or worse, and I think better, he is not just a fly-on-the-wall bystander, but an impassioned writer how can't help but get involved in the lives of the students. Reading this book made me want to become more involved.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2013Easily the the best thing I've read rhus far about the triumphs and defeats of college debate. Or high school, I guess. They have to go through more.